|
database
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Entreprise Manager behaviourI've got the following scenario: -Got two EM instances running at the same time. The same view on the right for both, this is, Tables. From EM1 I create a table called T. After that I'm going to EM2 and refresh. Fine because I am seeing the same object. -Come back to EM1 and drop T object and create again another T object but different, with more fields. When this time I'm going to EM2 and I do drop action I've dropped the most new object not the old one when I was waiting a messagebox or something like that warning me that I am deleting an object which is different than I though. Jezz, how can I do for to change this behaviour? Any help or comment woud be very appreciated. -- Current location: Alicante (ES) The behaviour you describe is exactly os should be expected.
When you drop a table in EM, EM actually executes a T-SQL drop table statement. Show quote "Enric" <vta***@terra.es.(donotspam)> wrote in message news:633618A6-5345-4F82-B27F-4C362546AA93@microsoft.com... > Dear all, > > I've got the following scenario: > > -Got two EM instances running at the same time. The same view on the right > for both, this is, Tables. > From EM1 I create a table called T. After that I'm going to EM2 and > refresh. > Fine because I am seeing the same object. > > -Come back to EM1 and drop T object and create again another T object but > different, with more fields. When this time I'm going to EM2 and I do drop > action I've dropped the most new object not the old one when I was waiting > a > messagebox or something like that warning me that I am deleting an object > which is different than I though. > > Jezz, how can I do for to change this behaviour? > > Any help or comment woud be very appreciated. > > -- > Current location: Alicante (ES) Hi Stephany,
Yes, I perfectly know it, but I was wondering myself how to change thanks anyway -- Show quoteCurrent location: Alicante (ES) "Stephany Young" wrote: > The behaviour you describe is exactly os should be expected. > > When you drop a table in EM, EM actually executes a T-SQL drop table > statement. > > > > "Enric" <vta***@terra.es.(donotspam)> wrote in message > news:633618A6-5345-4F82-B27F-4C362546AA93@microsoft.com... > > Dear all, > > > > I've got the following scenario: > > > > -Got two EM instances running at the same time. The same view on the right > > for both, this is, Tables. > > From EM1 I create a table called T. After that I'm going to EM2 and > > refresh. > > Fine because I am seeing the same object. > > > > -Come back to EM1 and drop T object and create again another T object but > > different, with more fields. When this time I'm going to EM2 and I do drop > > action I've dropped the most new object not the old one when I was waiting > > a > > messagebox or something like that warning me that I am deleting an object > > which is different than I though. > > > > Jezz, how can I do for to change this behaviour? > > > > Any help or comment woud be very appreciated. > > > > -- > > Current location: Alicante (ES) > > > What would you like to change? Do you want to drop objects without actually
dropping them? What are you trying to achieve? ML --- http://milambda.blogspot.com/ No, I hope that EM works fine. Did it make sense such scenario? I think so.
-- Show quoteCurrent location: Alicante (ES) "ML" wrote: > What would you like to change? Do you want to drop objects without actually > dropping them? > > What are you trying to achieve? > > ML > > --- > http://milambda.blogspot.com/ > Jezz, how can I do for to change this behaviour? Stop using EM at all :-))Show quote "Enric" <vta***@terra.es.(donotspam)> wrote in message news:633618A6-5345-4F82-B27F-4C362546AA93@microsoft.com... > Dear all, > > I've got the following scenario: > > -Got two EM instances running at the same time. The same view on the right > for both, this is, Tables. > From EM1 I create a table called T. After that I'm going to EM2 and > refresh. > Fine because I am seeing the same object. > > -Come back to EM1 and drop T object and create again another T object but > different, with more fields. When this time I'm going to EM2 and I do drop > action I've dropped the most new object not the old one when I was waiting > a > messagebox or something like that warning me that I am deleting an object > which is different than I though. > > Jezz, how can I do for to change this behaviour? > > Any help or comment woud be very appreciated. > > -- > Current location: Alicante (ES) In fact, I hope that in early period of time EM will be living and sharing
time with Sql Management Studio -- Show quoteCurrent location: Alicante (ES) "Uri Dimant" wrote: > > Jezz, how can I do for to change this behaviour? > Stop using EM at all :-)) > > "Enric" <vta***@terra.es.(donotspam)> wrote in message > news:633618A6-5345-4F82-B27F-4C362546AA93@microsoft.com... > > Dear all, > > > > I've got the following scenario: > > > > -Got two EM instances running at the same time. The same view on the right > > for both, this is, Tables. > > From EM1 I create a table called T. After that I'm going to EM2 and > > refresh. > > Fine because I am seeing the same object. > > > > -Come back to EM1 and drop T object and create again another T object but > > different, with more fields. When this time I'm going to EM2 and I do drop > > action I've dropped the most new object not the old one when I was waiting > > a > > messagebox or something like that warning me that I am deleting an object > > which is different than I though. > > > > Jezz, how can I do for to change this behaviour? > > > > Any help or comment woud be very appreciated. > > > > -- > > Current location: Alicante (ES) > > > Great, trade in your Yugo for a Kia. Management Studio is certainly a
better tool than Enterprise Manager in general, but it still shares a lot of its flaws and limitations. Hopefully, at least, you'll learn commands like DROP TABLE and BEGIN TRAN / COMMIT TRAN, instead of pointing and clicking yourself to inevitable disaster. Show quote > In fact, I hope that in early period of time EM will be living and sharing > time with Sql Management Studio drop and commit? I unfortunately know them
-- Show quoteCurrent location: Alicante (ES) "Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP]" wrote: > Great, trade in your Yugo for a Kia. Management Studio is certainly a > better tool than Enterprise Manager in general, but it still shares a lot of > its flaws and limitations. > > Hopefully, at least, you'll learn commands like DROP TABLE and BEGIN TRAN / > COMMIT TRAN, instead of pointing and clicking yourself to inevitable > disaster. > > > > > > > > > > In fact, I hope that in early period of time EM will be living and sharing > > time with Sql Management Studio > > > > drop and commit? I unfortunately know them Well, I should have said, learn to use them. I would much rather write DROP TABLE and/or wrap my commands in transactions than blindly trust what some GUI is going to do. Especially when I'm doing some backhanded thing like just trying to see what will happen when I bounce quickly between two open apps on the same machine... A Well, I always use dml statements but from time to time I am getting boring
and so that... -- Show quoteCurrent location: Alicante (ES) "Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP]" wrote: > > drop and commit? I unfortunately know them > > Well, I should have said, learn to use them. I would much rather write DROP > TABLE and/or wrap my commands in transactions than blindly trust what some > GUI is going to do. Especially when I'm doing some backhanded thing like > just trying to see what will happen when I bounce quickly between two open > apps on the same machine... > > A > > > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||