|
database
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
tough requestMy Table: [FlagData] { FlagDataID, FlagID, DataDesc, DataValue} An example: FlagDataID = 1 FlagID = 5 DataDesc = 'FirstName' DataValue = 'Brian' FlagDataID = 2 FlagID = 5 DataDesc = 'LastName' DataValue = 'Smyth' How can I check if there are records with same FlagID and with (DataDesc = 'FirstName' and DataValue = 'Brian') and (DataDesc = 'LastName' and DataValue='Smyth') ?? I can't figure out how to do that. Thanks Try:
select FlagDataID from FlagData where (DataDesc = 'FirstName' and DataValue = 'Brian') and (DataDesc ='LastName' and DataValue='Smyth') group by FlagDataID having count (*) = 2 This technique is known as Relational Division. -- Tom ---------------------------------------------------- Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA SQL Server MVP Toronto, ON Canada .. <samuelberthe***@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1155892208.053876.119710@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... My Table:Hello, [FlagData] { FlagDataID, FlagID, DataDesc, DataValue} An example: FlagDataID = 1 FlagID = 5 DataDesc = 'FirstName' DataValue = 'Brian' FlagDataID = 2 FlagID = 5 DataDesc = 'LastName' DataValue = 'Smyth' How can I check if there are records with same FlagID and with (DataDesc = 'FirstName' and DataValue = 'Brian') and (DataDesc = 'LastName' and DataValue='Smyth') ?? I can't figure out how to do that. Thanks Hi Tom,
Thanks for the reply. I've tried your solution, but it doesn't return any row. There's should be one match. Any idea what's going wrong ? In Tom's solution simply replace FlagDataID with FlagID.
Roy Harvey Beacon Falls, CT On 18 Aug 2006 04:36:38 -0700, samuelberthe***@googlemail.com wrote: Show quote >Hi Tom, > >Thanks for the reply. >I've tried your solution, but it doesn't return any row. There's should >be one match. Any idea what's going wrong ? Hi Roy,
Yes I tried that actually, but sitll it returns no row. select FlagID from FlagData where (DataDesc = 'FirstName' and DataValueStr = 'BRUCE') and (DataDesc ='LastName' and DataValueStr ='CHIZEN') group by FlagID having count (*) = 2 ---> retuns nothing select * from flagdata where flagid = 2 --> returns FlagID DataDesc DataValueStr DataValueFlt FlagDataId 2 Multiplier NULL 0.29999999999999999 2 2 FirstName BRUCE NULL 11 2 LastName CHIZEN NULL 835 Try this.
SELECT FlagID FROM FlagData WHERE (DataDesc = 'FirstName' and DataValue = 'Brian') OR (DataDesc = 'LastName' and DataValue='Smyth') GROUP BY FlagID HAVING COUNT(distinct DataDesc) = 2 Roy Harvey Beacon Falls, CT On 18 Aug 2006 07:03:00 -0700, samuelberthe***@googlemail.com wrote: Show quote >Hi Roy, >Yes I tried that actually, but sitll it returns no row. > > >select > FlagID >from > FlagData >where > (DataDesc = 'FirstName' and DataValueStr = 'BRUCE') >and (DataDesc ='LastName' and DataValueStr ='CHIZEN') > >group by > FlagID >having > count (*) = 2 > >---> retuns nothing > > > >select * from flagdata where flagid = 2 > >--> returns > >FlagID DataDesc DataValueStr DataValueFlt >FlagDataId >2 Multiplier NULL 0.29999999999999999 2 >2 FirstName BRUCE NULL 11 >2 LastName CHIZEN NULL 835 This design is called EAV (Entity-Attribute-Value) and it is a
nightmare that newbies keep re-inventing about every 1-2 months. Try this quick example. CREATE TABLE EAV -- no key declared (key_col VARCHAR (10) NULL, attrib_value VARCHAR (50) NULL); INSERT INTO EAV VALUES ('LOCATION','Bedroom'); INSERT INTO EAV VALUES ('LOCATION','Dining Room'); INSERT INTO EAV VALUES ('LOCATION','Bathroom'); INSERT INTO EAV VALUES ('LOCATION','courtyard'); INSERT INTO EAV VALUES ('EVENT','verbal aggression'); INSERT INTO EAV VALUES ('EVENT','peer'); INSERT INTO EAV VALUES ('EVENT','bad behavior'); INSERT INTO EAV VALUES ('EVENT','other'); CREATE TABLE EAV_DATA -note lack of constraints, defaults, DRI (id INTEGER IDENTITY (1,1) NOT NULL, bts_id INTEGER NULL, key_col VARCHAR (10) NULL, attrib_value VARCHAR (50) NULL ); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (1, 'LOCATION', 'Bedroom'); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (1, 'EVENT', 'other'); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (1, 'EVENT', 'bad behavior'); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (2, 'LOCATION', 'Bedroom'); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (2, 'EVENT', 'other'); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (2, 'EVENT', 'verbal aggression'); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (3, 'LOCATION', 'courtyard'); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (3, 'EVENT', 'other'); INSERT INTO EAV_DATA VALUES (3, 'EVENT', 'peer'); Ideally, the result set of the query would be Location Event count (headings if possible) Bedroom verbal aggression 1 Bedroom peer 0 Bedroom bad behavior 0 Bedroom other 2 Dining Room verbal aggression 0 Dining Room peer 0 Dining Room bad behavior 0 Dining Room other 0 Bathroom verbal aggression 0 Bathroom peer 0 Bathroom bad behavior 0 Bathroom other 0 courtyard verbal aggression 0 courtyard peer 1 courtyard bad behavior 0 courtyard other 1 Also, if possible, another query would return this result set. (I think I know how to do this one.) Location Event count Bedroom verbal aggression 1 Bedroom other 2 courtyard peer 1 courtyard other 1 Here is an answer From: Thomas Coleman SELECT Locations.locationvalue, Events.eventvalue, (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT LocationData.locationvalue, EventData.eventvalue FROM (SELECT TD1.bts_id, TD1.value AS locationvalue FROM eav_data AS TD1 WHERE TD1.key = 'location') AS LocationData INNER JOIN (SELECT TD2.bts_id, TD2.value AS eventvalue FROM eav_data AS TD2 WHERE TD2.key = 'event' ) AS EventData ON LocationData.bts_id = EventData.bts_id ) AS CollatedEventData WHERE CollatedEventData.locationvalue = Locations.locationvalue AND CollatedEventData.eventvalue = Events.eventvalue FROM (SELECT T1.value AS locationvalue FROM EAV AS T1 WHERE T1.key = 'location') AS Locations, (SELECT T2.value AS eventvalue FROM EAV AS T2 WHERE T2.key = 'event') AS Events ORDER BY Locations.locationvalue, Events.eventvalue , SELECT Locations.locationvalue, Events.eventvalue (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT LocationData.locationvalue, EventData.eventvalue FROM (SELECT TD1.bts_id, TD1.value AS locationvalue FROM eav_data AS TD1 WHERE TD1.key = 'location') AS LocationData INNER JOIN (SELECT TD2.bts_id, TD2.value AS eventvalue FROM eav_data AS TD2 WHERE TD2.key = 'event') AS EventData ON LocationData.bts_id = EventData.bts_id) AS CollatedEventData WHERE CollatedEventData.locationvalue = Locations.locationvalue AND CollatedEventData.eventvalue = Events.eventvalue) FROM (SELECT T1.value AS locationvalue FROM EAV AS T1 WHERE T1.key = 'location') AS Locations, (SELECT T2.value AS eventvalue FROM EAV AS T2 WHERE T2.key = 'event') AS Events; Is the same thing in a proper schema as: SELECT L.locationvalue, E.eventvalue, COUNT(*) FROM Locations AS L, Events AS E WHERE L.btd_id = E.btd_id GROUP BY L.locationvalue, E.eventvalue; The reason that I had to use so many subqueries is that those entities are all lopped into the same table. There should be separate tables for Locations and Events. There is such a thing as "too" generic. There has to be some structure or everything becomes nothing more than a couple of tables called "things". The real key (no pun intended) is commonality. Is there a pattern to the data that they want to store? It may not be possible to create one structure to rule them all and in the darkness bind them. "To be is to be something in particular; to be nothing in particular is to be nothing." --Aristole All data integrity is destroyed. Any typo becomes a new attribute or entity. Entities are found missing attributes, so all the reports are wrong. Try to write a single CHECK() constraint that works for all the attributes of those 30+ entities your users created because you were too dumb or too lazy to do your job. It can be done! You need a case expression with almost 70 WHEN clauses for a simple invoice and order system when I tried it as an exercise. Try to write a single DEFAULT clause for 30+ entities crammed into one column. Impossible! Try to set up DRI actions among the entities. If you thought the WHEN clauses in the single CASE expression were unmaintainable, wait until you see the "TRIGGERs from Hell" Now maintain it. For those who are interested, there are couple of links to articles I found on the net: Generic Design of Web-Based Clinical Databases http://www.jmir.org/2003/4/e27/ The EAV/CR Model of Data Representation http://ycmi.med.yale.edu/nadkarni/eav_CR_contents.htm An Introduction to Entity-Attribute-Value Design for Generic Clinical Study Data Management Systems http://ycmi.med.yale.edu/nadkarni/Introduction%20to%20EAV%20systems.htm Data Extraction and Ad Hoc Query of an Entity- Attribute- Value Database http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubme... Exploring Performance Issues for a Clinical Database Organized Using an Entity-Attribute-Value Representation http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubme... I worked for a company that did this kind of thing all the time. The thing falls apart in about a year of use. Orphans fill up the schema, and the bizarre queries are insanely slow. At the end of the year, when the first serious reports are done, you discover the lack of data integrity the hard way. Hi Samuel,
In the WHERE clause, a OR is maybe better. select FlagId from FlagData where (DataDesc = 'FirstName' and DataValue = 'Brian') OR (DataDesc ='LastName' and DataValue='Smyth') group by FlagId having Count(*) =2; Best regards, Michel BRUYÈRE Yep, that's the ticket. Usually, we put the search criteria in a table and
then join onto that. -- Tom ---------------------------------------------------- Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA SQL Server MVP Toronto, ON Canada .. "Michel Bru" <michel_bruy***@hotmail.com> wrote in message In the WHERE clause, a OR is maybe better.news:1155919283.062225.72990@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... Hi Samuel, select FlagId from FlagData where (DataDesc = 'FirstName' and DataValue = 'Brian') OR (DataDesc ='LastName' and DataValue='Smyth') group by FlagId having Count(*) =2; Best regards, Michel BRUYÈRE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||