|
database
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
How can I calculate a running YTD sumcalculate a running YTD sum value in the following scenario: -- START CREATE EXAMPLE CREATE TABLE dbo.tblTestData ( generic_id int NOT NULL IDENTITY (1, 1), data_date smalldatetime NOT NULL, metric_value int NOT NULL ) ON [PRIMARY] GO ALTER TABLE dbo.tblTestData ADD CONSTRAINT PK_tblTestData PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( generic_id ) ON [PRIMARY] GO DECLARE @data_date AS SMALLDATETIME SET @data_date = '1/1/2005' WHILE @data_date <= GETDATE() BEGIN INSERT INTO dbo.tblTestData (data_date, metric_value) VALUES (@data_date, CAST(RAND() * 100 AS INT)) SET @data_date = DATEADD(mm, 1, @data_date) END -- END CREATE EXAMPLE This creates a table with some bogus data by month. Something like this: generic_id data_date metric_value ----------- ----------------------- ------------ 1 2005-01-01 00:00:00 82 2 2005-02-01 00:00:00 95 3 2005-03-01 00:00:00 79 4 2005-04-01 00:00:00 65 5 2005-05-01 00:00:00 19 6 2005-06-01 00:00:00 84 7 2005-07-01 00:00:00 54 8 2005-08-01 00:00:00 47 9 2005-09-01 00:00:00 28 10 2005-10-01 00:00:00 52 11 2005-11-01 00:00:00 59 12 2005-12-01 00:00:00 69 13 2006-01-01 00:00:00 35 14 2006-02-01 00:00:00 6 15 2006-03-01 00:00:00 50 16 2006-04-01 00:00:00 45 17 2006-05-01 00:00:00 31 18 2006-06-01 00:00:00 78 19 2006-07-01 00:00:00 35 20 2006-08-01 00:00:00 16 I want to query that table calculating a new column, call it "metric_value_ytd_sum". It would add up the metric_value numbers each month starting at the beginning of the given year up to the month of the current row. Using the example output above, the output might be as follows: generic_id data_date metric_value metric_value_ytd_sum ----------- ----------------------- ------------- -------------------- 1 2005-01-01 00:00:00 82 82 2 2005-02-01 00:00:00 95 177 3 2005-03-01 00:00:00 79 256 .. .. .. Also it's important to note that as the data moves from one year to the next the YTD calculation needs to be sensative to this (it shouldn't do a running sum on the whole dataset, probably some group by year somewhere?) Anyway, I get the feeling this is the type of thing I'll feel silly about asking once I understand a solution, but just the same I've been unable to figure it out so far and would appreciate any assistance. Thanks! > I want to query that table calculating a new column, call it Why do you need to create a new column that has to be maintained constantly, > "metric_value_ytd_sum". when you can always generate this new column at query time? Something like this (untested): SELECT generic_id, data_date, metric_value, ytd_sum = (SELECT SUM(metric_value) FROM table WHERE data_date < outer.data_date AND data_date >= DATEADD(MONTH, 1-MONTH(outer.data_date), DATEADD(DAY, 1-DAY(outer.data_date), outer.data_date)) ) FROM table outer ORDER BY generic_id; I strongly recommend against storing this data, mostly because it's redundant information. It would add up the metric_value numbers each Show quote > month starting at the beginning of the given year up to the month of > the current row. Using the example output above, the output might be > as follows: > > generic_id data_date metric_value metric_value_ytd_sum > ----------- ----------------------- ------------- -------------------- > 1 2005-01-01 00:00:00 82 82 > 2 2005-02-01 00:00:00 95 177 > 3 2005-03-01 00:00:00 79 256 > . > . > . > > Also it's important to note that as the data moves from one year to the > next the YTD calculation needs to be sensative to this (it shouldn't do > a running sum on the whole dataset, probably some group by year > somewhere?) > > Anyway, I get the feeling this is the type of thing I'll feel silly > about asking once I understand a solution, but just the same I've been > unable to figure it out so far and would appreciate any assistance. > > Thanks! > > WHERE data_date < outer.data_date Sorry, should be <=Perfect, thanks again!
Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP] wrote: Show quote > > WHERE data_date < outer.data_date > > Sorry, should be <= You're absolutely correct, I didn't mean to imply that I wanted to
store it as another column in the table, but rather have the value calculated in the query at runtime as you state. Your example is exactly what I was looking for. The results were off-set by a month, but I adjusted by making the lower bound "<=" instead of "<". Also my db engine didn't like the alias "outer" so I changed it: SELECT generic_id, data_date, metric_value, (SELECT SUM(metric_value) AS metric_value_total FROM tblTestData WHERE (data_date <= outerTable.data_date) AND (data_date >= DATEADD(MONTH, 1 - MONTH(outerTable.data_date), DATEADD(DAY, 1 - DAY(outerTable.data_date), outerTable.data_date))) ) AS ytd_sum FROM tblTestData AS outerTable ORDER BY generic_id Thanks for being so helpful! Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP] wrote: Show quote > > I want to query that table calculating a new column, call it > > "metric_value_ytd_sum". > > Why do you need to create a new column that has to be maintained constantly, > when you can always generate this new column at query time? Something like > this (untested): > > SELECT generic_id, > data_date, > metric_value, > ytd_sum = (SELECT SUM(metric_value) FROM table > WHERE data_date < outer.data_date > AND data_date >= DATEADD(MONTH, 1-MONTH(outer.data_date), > DATEADD(DAY, 1-DAY(outer.data_date), outer.data_date)) > ) > FROM > table outer > ORDER BY generic_id; > > > I strongly recommend against storing this data, mostly because it's > redundant information. > > > > It would add up the metric_value numbers each > > month starting at the beginning of the given year up to the month of > > the current row. Using the example output above, the output might be > > as follows: > > > > generic_id data_date metric_value metric_value_ytd_sum > > ----------- ----------------------- ------------- -------------------- > > 1 2005-01-01 00:00:00 82 82 > > 2 2005-02-01 00:00:00 95 177 > > 3 2005-03-01 00:00:00 79 256 > > . > > . > > . > > > > Also it's important to note that as the data moves from one year to the > > next the YTD calculation needs to be sensative to this (it shouldn't do > > a running sum on the whole dataset, probably some group by year > > somewhere?) > > > > Anyway, I get the feeling this is the type of thing I'll feel silly > > about asking once I understand a solution, but just the same I've been > > unable to figure it out so far and would appreciate any assistance. > > > > Thanks! > > Arthur Dent wrote:
Show quote > I want to query that table calculating a new column, call it hmm...> "metric_value_ytd_sum". It would add up the metric_value numbers each > month starting at the beginning of the given year up to the month of > the current row. Using the example output above, the output might be > as follows: > > generic_id data_date metric_value metric_value_ytd_sum > ----------- ----------------------- ------------- -------------------- > 1 2005-01-01 00:00:00 82 82 > 2 2005-02-01 00:00:00 95 177 > 3 2005-03-01 00:00:00 79 256 > . > . > . > > Also it's important to note that as the data moves from one year to the > next the YTD calculation needs to be sensative to this (it shouldn't do > a running sum on the whole dataset, probably some group by year > somewhere?) > > Anyway, I get the feeling this is the type of thing I'll feel silly > about asking once I understand a solution, but just the same I've been > unable to figure it out so far and would appreciate any assistance. > > Thanks! I don't have access to a system to test on right now, maybe this will work (lol! I'm not even 100% sure the syntax is legit, but it's an interesting problem so I'm posting anyway! ;) ) ? SELECT generic_id AS generic_id_0, data_date AS data_date_0, metric_value AS metric_value_0, metric_value_ytd_sum AS SUM(tmp.metric_value_1) FROM tableWhoseNameIForgot, (SELECT generic_id AS generic_id_1, data_date AS data_date_1, metric_value AS metric_value_1 FROM tableWhoseNameIForgot WHERE data_date_1 <= data_date_0 ) AS tmp I've seen this type of thing before in reporting tools, but those had been implemented with loops in code that calculated the ytd sums and then stored those in a different table which was used to generate reports, the source tables were not used directly for reports. I was told it was faster that way, but I'm doubtful that is true for much of that tool in question... Whoa Lord Zoltar! (just sounds funny to say) I'm not sure I follow
(syntax is doesn't parse as you thought it wouldn't) but it looks like you're thinking along the lines of a derrived table rather than a subquery in the select clause as Aaron's solution suggested. I'd be curious to see if that way may work too... might come in handy as this problem becomes more complex (multipe YTD calucalations going on with different columns). Ideas? lord.zol***@gmail.com wrote: Show quote > Arthur Dent wrote: > > I want to query that table calculating a new column, call it > > "metric_value_ytd_sum". It would add up the metric_value numbers each > > month starting at the beginning of the given year up to the month of > > the current row. Using the example output above, the output might be > > as follows: > > > > generic_id data_date metric_value metric_value_ytd_sum > > ----------- ----------------------- ------------- -------------------- > > 1 2005-01-01 00:00:00 82 82 > > 2 2005-02-01 00:00:00 95 177 > > 3 2005-03-01 00:00:00 79 256 > > . > > . > > . > > > > Also it's important to note that as the data moves from one year to the > > next the YTD calculation needs to be sensative to this (it shouldn't do > > a running sum on the whole dataset, probably some group by year > > somewhere?) > > > > Anyway, I get the feeling this is the type of thing I'll feel silly > > about asking once I understand a solution, but just the same I've been > > unable to figure it out so far and would appreciate any assistance. > > > > Thanks! > > > hmm... > > I don't have access to a system to test on right now, maybe this will > work (lol! I'm not even 100% sure the syntax is legit, but it's an > interesting problem so I'm posting anyway! ;) ) ? > > SELECT generic_id AS generic_id_0, > data_date AS data_date_0, > metric_value AS metric_value_0, > metric_value_ytd_sum AS SUM(tmp.metric_value_1) > FROM tableWhoseNameIForgot, > (SELECT generic_id AS generic_id_1, > data_date AS data_date_1, > metric_value AS metric_value_1 > FROM tableWhoseNameIForgot > WHERE data_date_1 <= data_date_0 > ) AS tmp > > I've seen this type of thing before in reporting tools, but those had > been implemented with loops in code that calculated the ytd sums and > then stored those in a different table which was used to generate > reports, the source tables were not used directly for reports. I was > told it was faster that way, but I'm doubtful that is true for much of > that tool in question... |
|||||||||||||||||||||||