|
database
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
sql 2005 faster than 2000?i keep experiencing that complex queries run vastly faster than 2000 (from
about 1 hour to 2 minutes, and 2006 server is an old slower server). Does anyone have similar experience? Or could backup/restore (rebuild index, etc...) cause such an improvement? There are a lot of transparent, under-the-covers optimizations. Upgrading
alone can cause performance boosts (though an hour to 2 minutes sounds a lot more extreme than that). Add to that the things you can do on purpose to improve performance, such as a much better database engine tuning advisor (the tool formerly known as the index tuning wizard). However, several people here have reported their applications have slowed down after the upgrade. I suspect most of that is due to fragmentation, not updating statistics, not rebuilding indexes, staying in 80 compatibility mode, in-place upgrade due to backup/restore, or maybe it's the first time the proc is updated and the cache is empty, etc. A Show quote "nkw" <n**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:82FAC2F7-05A0-4958-A023-954A984D4756@microsoft.com... >i keep experiencing that complex queries run vastly faster than 2000 (from > about 1 hour to 2 minutes, and 2006 server is an old slower server). Does > anyone have similar experience? Or could backup/restore (rebuild index, > etc...) cause such an improvement? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||